Policy Matters
Early Childhood
5 min read

Hope on the HORIZON for Kentucky’s Youngest Learners and Working Families

Hope on the HORIZON for Kentucky’s Youngest Learners and Working Families
Written by
The Prichard Committee
Published on
February 16, 2024

Earlier this week in Frankfort, Senator Danny Carroll filed Senate Bill 203, also dubbed the Horizon Act.

With it comes a proposed Senate budget request of $150 million per year, or $300 million for the biennium. This is the most significant proposed state investment in early childhood education to date and brings us closer to the Prichard Committee’s Big Bold Ask for the early care and education sector. The Horizon Act’s provisions are partly aimed at addressing the projected further destabilization of an already Fragile Ecosystem of early care and education because of the funding cliff upon the expiration of pandemic-era federal Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG) dollars. But they do so much more.

Senator Carroll’s bill is premised on three key ideas:

1. Education begins at birth.

The Horizon Act seeks to establish a Foundations for Early Learning Fund ($73.125 million per year) that will provide a modest per-student allocation to licensed and certified early care and education providers who apply, based on their enrollment. Providers must participate in the Kentucky ALL STARS Quality Improvement Rating System to be eligible for these funds, which can be used for personnel or fixed expenses.  With this proposal, the bill sponsor makes a strong statement about early childhood education as encompassing the critical first years of a birth-to-12 education system.

SB 203 also proposes an appropriation of close to $72 million per year for child care investments, including CCAP (Child Care Assistance Program) subsidies for families at 85% of State Median Income (SMI), provider reimbursement at 80th percentile of the Market Rate Survey, provider payments for enrollment versus attendance, the continuation of income exclusion benefits for children of child care providers, support for working families transitioning out of CCAP eligibility,  and to cover the cost of federal background checks. SB 203 continues support for early childhood education professional scholarships and the Employee Child Care Assistance Partnership (ECCAP) program. SB 203 also proposes start-up grants for home-based and center-based providers to generate new early childhood education slots. These proposed early childhood policy and investment improvements are a major step forward on the Prichard Committee’s Big Bold Ask priorities.

2. The early childhood education profession is critical to secure and grow Kentucky’s workforce.

SB 203 proposes to rename the Division of Child Care as the Division of Early Childhood Education, and the Division of Regulated Child Care as the Division of Regulated Early Childhood Education. These changes pave the way towards a future where the words ‘daycare’ and ‘childcare’ are no longer the norm, and a unified governance structure oversees and supports the entire early childhood education ecosystem.

SB 203 also proposes the establishment of an associate degree in Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education (IECE) Entrepreneurship within the KCTCS (Kentucky Community and Technical College System) system, which bolsters the early childhood education professional pathway as a stackable component along with the Commonwealth Child Care Credential, the Child Development Associate (CDA) certificate, the Early Childhood Director Credential, the Infant and Toddler Credential, the School-Age Credential, and the bachelor’s degree in IECE.

The Horizon Act also proposes the inclusion of Early Childhood Education in the Work Ready Kentucky Scholarship Program and does not disqualify early childhood professionals with an associate or higher degree from eligibility to participate.

3. Early childhood education partnerships are key to the early childhood sector’s future.

A creative component of SB 203 is the proposed establishment of the Innovations in Early Childhood Education Delivery Fund ($5 million per year) to provide matching funds (up to $100,000 per year) to eligible applicants interested in increasing the availability and/or expanding the duration of early childhood education services in their communities. The goal of this fund is to entice entities outside of traditional private early care and education providers, such as for-profit and non-profit entities, public schools, local governments, and higher education institutions, to engage in innovative delivery models. It also incentivizes public-private partnerships with matching funds up to $125,000 a year.

In a press conference on Tuesday, Senator Carroll indicated that every child in the Commonwealth deserves access to high quality care and education. The Horizon Act moves our state in the direction of an early childhood system that includes all possible delivery models, and more than just the public schools as proposed in Governor Beshear’s budget.

The Prichard Committee has long been an advocate for early childhood education partnerships between privately and publicly funded entities as a key component of high-quality early care and education. We applaud Senator Carroll’s leadership in forging a path towards this end.

Jennifer Washburn, Strong Start Kentucky Coalition and Prichard Committee member and owner/director of the NAEYC-accredited 5-Star iKids Childhood Enrichment Center in Benton, Kentucky, spoke about what the Horizon Act will mean for early education providers such as herself, and for Kentucky’s working families and their children, who are faced with higher tuition rates, lack of early childhood educators due to teacher pay cuts, and worsening of the child care desert status of communities due to the closing of centers. “The Horizon Act is an exceptional starting point to address the needs of a broken system. The Horizon Act gives hope that real change is on the horizon for Kentucky’s youngest citizens and their families.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay up to date with our work.

By subscribing, you consent to receive updates from The Prichard Committee.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Recent posts

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement
5 min read

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement

Kentucky has seen improvement in four of the measures that the Prichard Committee most closely tracks.

Oct. 3, 2024

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Lisa McKinney

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

(cell) 859-475-7202

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement

Community Accountability Necessary to Quicken the Pace

A statement from Brigitte Blom, President and CEO

LEXINGTON, Ky -- In the new public school learning results data released today by the Kentucky Department of Education, Kentucky has seen improvement in four of the measures that the Prichard Committee most closely tracks. Compared to 2023, the new data release shows:

  • A 2% increase in the kindergarten readiness of students entering school last fall
  • A 1% increase in grade 3 students scoring proficient or above in reading
  • A 1% increase in grade 8 mathematics proficiency
  • A 1% increase in the four-year high school graduation rate

There was no progress on two other priority measures:

  • No increase in grade 3 mathematics proficiency
  • A 3% decline in grade 8 reading proficiency

Even the measures that have improved remain far from Kentucky’s long-term goals. For example, only 47% of 2024 third-grade students were proficient or above in reading. If we continue improving at a pace of 1% each year, it could take 53 years to get all Kentucky students to the proficient level in that foundational subject.The results released today also confirm the urgency of Kentucky’s work to ensure that students of all backgrounds thrive in our schools:

  • Even as grade 3 reading proficiency rose overall, it declined for English learners and for students with disabilities and showed no improvement for economically disadvantaged students and Hispanic or Latino students.  
  • Grade 8 math results also rose overall, but showed no improvement for African American, Hispanic or Latino students and English learners. In slightly better news, economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities did see grade 8 mathematics improvement that was a bit stronger than that of their classmates.
  • The other indicators provide similar evidence that we have not yet moved beyond our historic failures in closing achievement gaps.

The Prichard Committee will be doing further analysis on postsecondary readiness. It is difficult to compare this year’s 81% readiness rate directly to last year’s 79% rate, because this is the first year that readiness includes students who have been successful in work-based learning. While including that data going forward is beneficial, our analysis will need to consider how it affects year-to-year comparisons. We are also concerned to see that the percent of students reaching ACT benchmarks has declined and look forward to studying those patterns in more depth. If graduation rates remain steady or increase while postsecondary readiness measures decrease, that raises questions about how meaningful Kentucky’s high school diplomas are for preparing students for post-graduation life.

In response to today’s new data, the Prichard Committee urges Kentuckians in every community to review the results and develop new local efforts to ensure that our public schools offer all learners the full opportunities and supports they need to flourish. As a starting point, communities can work together on active family and community engagement, expanded and enriched learning times, integrated supports, and collaborative leadership and practices to support high-quality teaching.

The Prichard Committee also urges stronger state-level policy efforts and financial investments in our public schools. The new LETRS (Read to Succeed) program is off to a promising start, and added funding for kindergarten and school transportation are important starting points, but we need to do more as a commonwealth. Kentucky must deepen our efforts on teaching quality, working conditions, and shortages, and we must strengthen state SEEK funding, including meeting full transportation costs. Now is the time to invest appropriately in public education and ensure public dollars are not being diverted from the public schools that educate the vast majority of Kentucky students.

Overall, Kentucky’s future demands renewed and strengthened commitment to public schools that can equip each and every graduate has the durable skills and the depth of knowledge to succeed as adult learners, as workforce participants, and as contributors to our communities. It is every community members’ responsibility to help build a Big, Bold Future for the commonwealth with education at its core. Let’s get to work.

2024 SNAPSHOTS OF KENTUCKY K-12 RESULTS
5 min read

2024 SNAPSHOTS OF KENTUCKY K-12 RESULTS

This morning, the Kentucky Department of Education released important Kentucky State Assessment (KSA) results...

This morning, the Kentucky Department of Education released important Kentucky State Assessment (KSA) results and other indicators that matter for our public schools. As an added way to see some of the major patterns in that data, the Prichard Committee has created a 2023-24 Snapshot approach to statewide elementary school, middle school, and high school data and showing:

  • The statewide percent of students who scored proficient or distinguished in reading, mathematics, science, social studies, and writing on the 2023 KSA
  • Results for all students, for students who are and are not identified as English learners, for students with and without identified disabilities, for students with and without economic disadvantage, for students in seven groups by race and ethnicity, and for female and male students
  • A single page display for elementary school results and for middle school results
  • A two page display for high school results, with one page for KSA and another for ACT results, graduation rate, and postsecondary readiness rate

Unsurprisingly, the results shows that we have important work ahead to reach 100% proficiency and readiness, and they continue to show differences in how well we are serving students with different backgrounds and needs. For example, here’s a quick look at elementary school reading results, combining grades 3,4, and 5.

If we engage this data with candor and concern, it can strengthen our work to ensure that all Kentucky learners are welcome, respected, and empowered in our public schools.

As communities and as a commonwealth, we need public schools to equip every student in our rising generation to play a full role in Kentucky’s Big Bold Future.

Please do take a look at the new Snapshot data for each level.

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2
5 min read

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2

The Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence today released an analysis of Amendment 2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Aug. 20, 2024

Contact: Lisa McKinney

(cell) 859-475-7202

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2

Committee issues statement of opposition to the amendment

(LEXINGTON, Ky) --The Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence today released an analysis of Amendment 2, a proposed amendment to Kentucky’s Constitution that would allow the allocation of public funds to school choice options beyond traditional public schools. The analysis, which outlines the potential financial and education outcomes of the amendment, found that funding private K12 educational institutions is not an appropriate or effective use of public funds.  

Amendment 2 will appear on ballots in November.  

“An amendment to Kentucky’s constitution that opens the door to private school choice with public dollars is likely to have significantly negative consequences for Kentucky’s long-standing march to improve education outcomes,” said Prichard Committee President/CEO Brigitte Blom. “Diverting public dollars to private school choice options creates the conditions for an unregulated market with no accountability to the taxpayers who fund it, and no durable research that warrants such an investment.”

The amendment's passage would allow the legislature to direct public funds to support private schools (including parochial schools), homeschooling, and charter schools through various financial mechanisms like vouchers, tax credits and education savings accounts.

Diverting funds to private schools is shown to spread scarce resources across more providers, thereby reducing overall access and improvement to quality in education, especially in areas where there is population decline. This will certainly be true in rural areas of the state and could likely be true for the state as a whole with population decline forecasted in the years to come.  

Additionally, Amendment 2 would open the door to the state investing in education options that create barriers for accountability. Public schools are held to accountability standards of which private and parochial schools, as well as homeschools, are currently exempt.    

Research shows that in states with high participation in school choice programs, a significant portion of funds frequently benefit wealthier families, leaving low- and middle-income families with less funding for the public schools these families rely on. Ensuring public funds stay within the public education system supports a fair distribution of resources to help ensure better outcomes for all students, the analysis found.  

Additionally, public schools are required to serve all students, including those with disabilities and the need for additional support. Many private schools are not required to guarantee the same level of support for students with learning differences, and the requirement to serve all children falls back to the public system, with fewer resources.

“Investing state dollars in what works is critical, and even more so in a state like Kentucky where we've risen from the bottom of the national rankings since the 1990s to roughly the middle today,” said Blom. “While there is clearly more work to be done to continue to improve education outcomes - and parents can and must demand that improvement - now is not the time to spend shared public dollars on strategies with no durable outcomes at best - and negative outcomes at worst.”  

Read the Prichard Committee’s full analysis here.