Numbers Up
5 min read

New School Report Cards: Big Upgrade, Still With Some Challenges‍

New School Report Cards: Big Upgrade, Still With Some Challenges‍
Written by
Susan Perkins Weston
Published on
January 31, 2019

Kentucky’s new School Report Cards are here! The new format for annual data on our schools has a friendlier layout and some important innovations, so I’m going to share what I saw in my first tour of the site.

When you arrive at the main landing page, you can choose any public school or district: my notes are based on looking at Toliver Elementary and Danville High School. Once you choose, you can scroll down and start seeing the news.

Clear charts of key data points

The main page is broken into five sections, each with a nice selection of charts showing important facts about each school. For example, here’s how the Overview section shows who attends Toliver:

Notice that the chart on economically disadvantaged students says data on free and reduced lunch eligibility is not available? Good charts can highlight questions about our schools, and I definitely want to ask about the missing data for Toliver. Further down the page, there are also short displays for Academic Performance, Educational Opportunity, Transition Readiness, and School Safety.

Quick links to more detailed data

Just to the right of each group of charts, there are three links to additional kinds of data. For example, for the Overview section, there’s more about students, more about faculty, staff and community, and more about access to technology. For Academic Performance, there’s more on assessment and performance, achievement gap and growth, and career and technical education.

Easy-to-read tables of information

Here’s how some of Toliver’s reading results are displayed, much easier to read than the 17-column version of the older report cards:

Great disaggregated KPREP data, including the “not” groups

The previous report card format did not include KPREP results for students who are not economically disadvantaged, do not have identified disabilities, and are not English learners. Those “not” results are key to understanding the gaps between better-served and worst-served groups, so it’s good to see them published again. The KPREP charts are also set up to show results for gifted students and for students who are and are not homeless, migrant, in foster care, or dependents of a member of the military. That information help us understand the strengths and experiences students bring with them and the effectiveness of school efforts to support each learner. (Sadly, the fully expanded list appears to be only for KPREP: data on KSCREEN, ACT, graduation, and other results are disaggregated much less.)

New looks at educational opportunity

To check out this sections, I switched over to Danville High School, looking at student work toward college and career readiness. This was great new information. For career and technical education, I learned that 94 DHS students enrolled to learn about marketing, and 29 completed a multi-course marketing “career pathway.” 57 took the first step on Project Lead The Way Engineering, and six completed that pathway. For advanced coursework, 403 students took AP courses, 204 took AP tests, and 45% of the test-takers had at least one score that qualified them for college credit (quick multiplication: that’s 108 students). There was plenty more to explore, including detail on visual and performing arts, health and physical education, and world languages.

These most recent trends show Kentucky is moving toward a better-educated adult population, with good reason to expect that to add strength to our economy and richness to all aspects of our civic life. They also show that we need to continue and accelerate our growth in attainment, with particular attention to groups who are not sharing fully in that growth, including Black non-Hispanic students and students with low-incomes.

Some Openings for Improvement

While admiring the innovations just mentioned, I do want to note some places where I thought the design could be stronger:

  • The “not” groups could be included in more charts.
  • Graduation rates could be easier to find: they’re under the second tab for the academic readiness link in the Transition Readiness section.
  • The “Number of Instructional Minutes Students Receive per Week in Arts” could be better explained. For Danville High, the report shows 1,200 minutes per week in visual arts. That can’t mean that all students spend 20 hours in art classes. Does it mean there are four hour-long courses offered each term?
  • Graduates reaching academic and/or career readiness benchmarks could be shown clearly. I could only find a “readiness count” that seems to include both graduates meeting benchmarks and English learner graduates attaining English Language proficiency. I know the new Transition Indicator reflects both kinds of data, but the detailed charts could show us those counts separately before combining them.
  • A site map would be a great addition. There are five main sections with thirteen links to more detail, and many of those links lead to multiple tabs that each have several charts. A map would make this wide array of information easier to navigate.
  • A “data not available” message appeared almost every time I clicked a new link. Often, that message was replaced in a few seconds by helpful information. If the data can’t be displayed instantly, it might be helpful to have replace “not available” with “being located,” so users don’t leave the page too quickly.

Overall, these new School Report Cards are a great step up in data access for the public. There’s room for further improvement, but first this project deserves a round of public applause. I recommend that every Kentuckian use it heavily to learn more about students, schools, and results in our communities.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay up to date with our work.

By subscribing, you consent to receive updates from The Prichard Committee.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Recent posts

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement
5 min read

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement

Kentucky has seen improvement in four of the measures that the Prichard Committee most closely tracks.

Oct. 3, 2024

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Lisa McKinney

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

(cell) 859-475-7202

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement

Community Accountability Necessary to Quicken the Pace

A statement from Brigitte Blom, President and CEO

LEXINGTON, Ky -- In the new public school learning results data released today by the Kentucky Department of Education, Kentucky has seen improvement in four of the measures that the Prichard Committee most closely tracks. Compared to 2023, the new data release shows:

  • A 2% increase in the kindergarten readiness of students entering school last fall
  • A 1% increase in grade 3 students scoring proficient or above in reading
  • A 1% increase in grade 8 mathematics proficiency
  • A 1% increase in the four-year high school graduation rate

There was no progress on two other priority measures:

  • No increase in grade 3 mathematics proficiency
  • A 3% decline in grade 8 reading proficiency

Even the measures that have improved remain far from Kentucky’s long-term goals. For example, only 47% of 2024 third-grade students were proficient or above in reading. If we continue improving at a pace of 1% each year, it could take 53 years to get all Kentucky students to the proficient level in that foundational subject.The results released today also confirm the urgency of Kentucky’s work to ensure that students of all backgrounds thrive in our schools:

  • Even as grade 3 reading proficiency rose overall, it declined for English learners and for students with disabilities and showed no improvement for economically disadvantaged students and Hispanic or Latino students.  
  • Grade 8 math results also rose overall, but showed no improvement for African American, Hispanic or Latino students and English learners. In slightly better news, economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities did see grade 8 mathematics improvement that was a bit stronger than that of their classmates.
  • The other indicators provide similar evidence that we have not yet moved beyond our historic failures in closing achievement gaps.

The Prichard Committee will be doing further analysis on postsecondary readiness. It is difficult to compare this year’s 81% readiness rate directly to last year’s 79% rate, because this is the first year that readiness includes students who have been successful in work-based learning. While including that data going forward is beneficial, our analysis will need to consider how it affects year-to-year comparisons. We are also concerned to see that the percent of students reaching ACT benchmarks has declined and look forward to studying those patterns in more depth. If graduation rates remain steady or increase while postsecondary readiness measures decrease, that raises questions about how meaningful Kentucky’s high school diplomas are for preparing students for post-graduation life.

In response to today’s new data, the Prichard Committee urges Kentuckians in every community to review the results and develop new local efforts to ensure that our public schools offer all learners the full opportunities and supports they need to flourish. As a starting point, communities can work together on active family and community engagement, expanded and enriched learning times, integrated supports, and collaborative leadership and practices to support high-quality teaching.

The Prichard Committee also urges stronger state-level policy efforts and financial investments in our public schools. The new LETRS (Read to Succeed) program is off to a promising start, and added funding for kindergarten and school transportation are important starting points, but we need to do more as a commonwealth. Kentucky must deepen our efforts on teaching quality, working conditions, and shortages, and we must strengthen state SEEK funding, including meeting full transportation costs. Now is the time to invest appropriately in public education and ensure public dollars are not being diverted from the public schools that educate the vast majority of Kentucky students.

Overall, Kentucky’s future demands renewed and strengthened commitment to public schools that can equip each and every graduate has the durable skills and the depth of knowledge to succeed as adult learners, as workforce participants, and as contributors to our communities. It is every community members’ responsibility to help build a Big, Bold Future for the commonwealth with education at its core. Let’s get to work.

2024 SNAPSHOTS OF KENTUCKY K-12 RESULTS
5 min read

2024 SNAPSHOTS OF KENTUCKY K-12 RESULTS

This morning, the Kentucky Department of Education released important Kentucky State Assessment (KSA) results...

This morning, the Kentucky Department of Education released important Kentucky State Assessment (KSA) results and other indicators that matter for our public schools. As an added way to see some of the major patterns in that data, the Prichard Committee has created a 2023-24 Snapshot approach to statewide elementary school, middle school, and high school data and showing:

  • The statewide percent of students who scored proficient or distinguished in reading, mathematics, science, social studies, and writing on the 2023 KSA
  • Results for all students, for students who are and are not identified as English learners, for students with and without identified disabilities, for students with and without economic disadvantage, for students in seven groups by race and ethnicity, and for female and male students
  • A single page display for elementary school results and for middle school results
  • A two page display for high school results, with one page for KSA and another for ACT results, graduation rate, and postsecondary readiness rate

Unsurprisingly, the results shows that we have important work ahead to reach 100% proficiency and readiness, and they continue to show differences in how well we are serving students with different backgrounds and needs. For example, here’s a quick look at elementary school reading results, combining grades 3,4, and 5.

If we engage this data with candor and concern, it can strengthen our work to ensure that all Kentucky learners are welcome, respected, and empowered in our public schools.

As communities and as a commonwealth, we need public schools to equip every student in our rising generation to play a full role in Kentucky’s Big Bold Future.

Please do take a look at the new Snapshot data for each level.

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2
5 min read

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2

The Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence today released an analysis of Amendment 2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Aug. 20, 2024

Contact: Lisa McKinney

(cell) 859-475-7202

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2

Committee issues statement of opposition to the amendment

(LEXINGTON, Ky) --The Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence today released an analysis of Amendment 2, a proposed amendment to Kentucky’s Constitution that would allow the allocation of public funds to school choice options beyond traditional public schools. The analysis, which outlines the potential financial and education outcomes of the amendment, found that funding private K12 educational institutions is not an appropriate or effective use of public funds.  

Amendment 2 will appear on ballots in November.  

“An amendment to Kentucky’s constitution that opens the door to private school choice with public dollars is likely to have significantly negative consequences for Kentucky’s long-standing march to improve education outcomes,” said Prichard Committee President/CEO Brigitte Blom. “Diverting public dollars to private school choice options creates the conditions for an unregulated market with no accountability to the taxpayers who fund it, and no durable research that warrants such an investment.”

The amendment's passage would allow the legislature to direct public funds to support private schools (including parochial schools), homeschooling, and charter schools through various financial mechanisms like vouchers, tax credits and education savings accounts.

Diverting funds to private schools is shown to spread scarce resources across more providers, thereby reducing overall access and improvement to quality in education, especially in areas where there is population decline. This will certainly be true in rural areas of the state and could likely be true for the state as a whole with population decline forecasted in the years to come.  

Additionally, Amendment 2 would open the door to the state investing in education options that create barriers for accountability. Public schools are held to accountability standards of which private and parochial schools, as well as homeschools, are currently exempt.    

Research shows that in states with high participation in school choice programs, a significant portion of funds frequently benefit wealthier families, leaving low- and middle-income families with less funding for the public schools these families rely on. Ensuring public funds stay within the public education system supports a fair distribution of resources to help ensure better outcomes for all students, the analysis found.  

Additionally, public schools are required to serve all students, including those with disabilities and the need for additional support. Many private schools are not required to guarantee the same level of support for students with learning differences, and the requirement to serve all children falls back to the public system, with fewer resources.

“Investing state dollars in what works is critical, and even more so in a state like Kentucky where we've risen from the bottom of the national rankings since the 1990s to roughly the middle today,” said Blom. “While there is clearly more work to be done to continue to improve education outcomes - and parents can and must demand that improvement - now is not the time to spend shared public dollars on strategies with no durable outcomes at best - and negative outcomes at worst.”  

Read the Prichard Committee’s full analysis here.