Policy Matters
Ed.
5 min read

SEEK In the House Budget: An Explainer

SEEK In the House Budget: An Explainer
Written by
The Prichard Committee
Published on
February 7, 2024

For Kentucky K-12 education, one question comes first when analyzing state budget proposals: How will the plan affect Kentucky’s biggest funding program, known as SEEK (short for Support Education Excellence in Kentucky)? On February 1, the House approved a committee substitute version of House Bill 6, and this explainer takes on that first K-12 question.


Here’s the twist: the one question can be answered four ways. Comparing current FY 2024 resources to what HB6 offers for FY 2026, one can say:

  1. The SEEK base guarantee per student will rise $255.
  2. State SEEK base funding dollars will drop by more than $119 million.
  3. Total flexible SEEK funding will decline about $6 million (combining base SEEK, SEEK transportation, and Tier 1).
  4. Grand total SEEK funding will rise a bit more than $26 million (combining the flexible dollars, retirement contribution, facilities funding, and other earmarked resources).

Here, I’ll explain each answer in turn. Clarity on these four ways to address the SEEK question can contribute to shared understanding of the budget debates that will now move to the Senate for next action steps.

1. The SEEK base guarantee per student will rise $255

The guarantee per student will increase from the current $4,200 to $4,455. That’s the amount that districts are guaranteed for each student in ADA (adjusted average daily attendance).

2. State SEEK base funding will decline by more than $119 million

Feel free to blink a few times at per student rising while the total declines.

The simplest explanation is the state doesn’t pay the whole per student amount: it only guarantees that districts will end up with those dollars. The heart of the formula is three steps:

  • Districts are guaranteed base funding, calculated by multiplying the per-student amount by district ADA.
  • Districts pay part of the guaranteed base funding, with their share defined as 30¢ per $100 of the assessed value of their taxable property.
  • The state pays the rest of the guaranteed base funding, with the state portion being the guaranteed amount minus the district 30¢ revenue.

The process has a powerful effect on equity in our schools: districts contribute according to their local assets, but the formula guarantees them the same base amount per student whether their resources are lower than state average, close to average, or above average. This formula approach was one of the most important innovations of the Kentucky Education Reform Act of 1990.

This process also means that in step 1, declining ADA can lower district totals, and in step 2 rising property values can increase the local share. Both changes can result in the state share declining even when the per pupil guarantee is rising.

Both of those other changes are happening. ADA has declined both because Kentucky has fewer school-aged children and because of increasing student absence rates. And property values have increased substantially. Working together, the two trends explain how HB 6 can have a lower total appropriation for base SEEK with an increasing base guarantee per student.

This explanation needs one further element. The SEEK base appropriation also funds add-on amounts based on students with added needs: those eligible for free meals, with identified disabilities, learning English, and receiving home and hospital services. The amount for each student with those needs is tied to the guarantee per student, rising when the guarantee rises. The add-on portion further strengthens equity by adjusting for factors that can result in added student learning costs.

3. SEEK funding with flexibility will decline about $6 million

SEEK can also be understood as more than just the base portion. When I speak of SEEK as Kentucky’s main program for funding K-12 education, I’m thinking of the three line items that provide districts with completely flexible resources. On that understanding, SEEK funding includes:

  • The base discussed above, including the add-ons.
  • Transportation funding, based on a separate calculation that uses student rider counts, distances traveled and other cost factors.
  • A Tier I optional element: districts can voluntarily raise revenue above the 30¢ per $100 and qualify for state equalization that gives them up to 15% more revenue.

In Kentucky law, school districts can use any part of those resources to pay any part of their costs for teaching, learning, and operations. Or, to say it another way, these three flexible parts do not come with “earmarks” requiring districts to account for how each dollar was used to provide a required service. In contrast, other parts of the state education budget do come with strings attached, requiring those dollars to be spent on reading interventions, preschool services, facilities, and other specifics.

Taking the three parts together, total SEEK funding with flexibility will also decline from FY 2024 to FY 2026 under the current HB 6.

The increased transportation funding is a very positive thing. In FY 2026, the appropriation will cover full cost of school transportation for the first time in many years. Resuming full funding is an important element of the Big Bold Ask. It’s a stand-out improvement proposed in the current HB 6.

The transportation increase will balance out some of the decline in SEEK base and Tier 1, but not all of it. Looking at the three lines together, districts stand to receive fewer flexible SEEK dollars in FY 2026 than they are getting in current FY 2024.

These flexible SEEK dollars matter because they are available for any school need. For example, these are the only three state budget line items that can be used to improve districtwide salary scales, recruit new staff, and financially reward current hard-working educators for the extraordinarily challenging work we ask them to take on.

4. Grand total SEEK funding will rise a bit more than $26 million

There’s one more way to talk about SEEK. In state budget bills, the Department of Education has three numbered sections, starting with “1. Support Education Excellence Kentucky.” That section includes the flexible line items just discussed, and it also includes funding that is legally committed to teachers’ retirement, school facilities, and a few smaller items. Here’s a table showing them all.

The grand total will increase by $26.4 million, meaning that the state will spend more in this budget section in FY 2026 than it is planning to spend in the current FY 2024.

A Concluding Note

One question – How will HB 6 affect SEEK? – has four possible answers. Under the House Committee Substitute, the guarantee per student will rise, base dollars will decline, total flexible funding will decline, and the grand total budget section will increase.

Ideally, this explainer will lead readers to ask follow-up questions about what this budget will make possible for Kentucky’s students.

Some of the follow-up questions can be about whether these dollars enable adjustments to the salaries paid to teachers and other education staff. With the flexible dollars are going down, it’s hard to say the bill provides state funding to strengthen those payrolls. That can be true even while we are celebrating the transportation boost and being glad to see the increases for retirement and facilities.

There can be many other questions, and then there should be one essential question beneath all the others: how well will these dollars, in concert with local and federal funds, help Kentucky build a big bold future, both for individual students and for the entire commonwealth? That’s the right puzzle for all of us to consider.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay up to date with our work.

By subscribing, you consent to receive updates from The Prichard Committee.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Recent posts

Statement on the 2025 Kentucky Legislative Session from Brigitte Blom, the Prichard Committee
5 min read

Statement on the 2025 Kentucky Legislative Session from Brigitte Blom, the Prichard Committee

The 2025 General Assembly brought forward a series of education bills—some narrow in scope, others more sweeping...

March 28, 2025

Contact: Lisa McKinney, Communications Director, The Prichard Committee

(cell) 859-475-7202

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

Statement on the 2025 Kentucky Legislative Session from Brigitte Blom, the Prichard Committee

LEXINGTON, Ky — The 2025 General Assembly brought forward a series of education bills—some narrow in scope, others more sweeping—but together, they represent real shifts in how Kentucky supports students and schools. While no single measure defined the session, the cumulative effect is significant. Taken together, these policies signal new expectations for schools and postsecondary institutions—and new responsibilities for the communities that support them.

House Bill 190 is a powerful step forward in expanding opportunity and excellence in Kentucky high schools. The bill requires school districts to adopt plans to automatically enroll students who meet established benchmarks into advanced coursework such as Advanced Placement, dual credit, and other college-level classes. This is a needed step to ensure that readiness—not bias or barriers—determines access to challenging academic opportunities. When students are encouraged to take rigorous courses and supported to succeed, they are more likely to graduate prepared for college, career, and life.

House Bill 208 takes a proactive step to support student learning, focus, and well-being in Kentucky schools. The bill requires school districts to adopt policies prohibiting personal cell phone use during the school day—except for emergencies and instructional purposes—while also strengthening safeguards against harmful online content. By minimizing classroom distractions, the bill helps students stay engaged, build stronger peer relationships, and develop healthy digital habits.

House Bill 4 limits how public colleges and universities in Kentucky can design or fund programs for historically underrepresented students. With Kentucky ranking 46th in postsecondary enrollment and 44th in degree attainment—and wide gaps in outcomes by race and ethnicity—the state must closely monitor how these changes affect access, support, and completion. Today, 61% of Asian or Pacific Islander and 36% of white Kentuckians aged 25–64 hold an associate degree or higher, compared to just 29% of Black and 27% of Hispanic or Latino Kentuckians. As institutions adjust, local communities and nonprofits will play an increasingly important role in ensuring all students have the support they need to enroll, persist, and succeed.

The 2025 Big Bold Future National Rankings Report makes clear where Kentucky must focus its efforts—from early childhood to postsecondary access and degree attainment. It shows us not just where we stand, but where we need to go. Kentucky’s future will be shaped not only by what happens in Frankfort, but by the everyday decisions made in classrooms and communities across the Commonwealth. The Prichard Committee stands ready to support community members, state leaders, families, and schools in coming together for the common good of Kentucky’s students and the future of our Commonwealth.

------

The Prichard Committee believes in the power and promise of public education –early childhood through college– to ensure Kentuckians’ economic and social well-being. We are a citizen-led, non-partisan, solutions-focused nonprofit, established in 1983 with a singular mission of realizing a path to a larger life for Kentuckians with education at the core.

Automatic Enrollment is a Commonsense Innovation for Kentucky
5 min read

Automatic Enrollment is a Commonsense Innovation for Kentucky

Automatic enrollment is one of the most intriguing educational innovations in recent years.

By: Jonathan Plucker and Brenda Berg

The Kentucky General Assembly is currently considering a bill that would require school districts to establish policies for automatic enrollment in the Commonwealth’s public schools. Introduced by Rep. Robert Duvall and co-sponsored by Rep. Vanessa Grossl, HB 190 passed the House unanimously and can be considered by the Senate in the session’s final two legislative days on March 27  & 28.      

Automatic enrollment is one of the most intriguing educational innovations in recent years. Also known as auto-, mandatory, or opt-out enrollment, the concept is simple: Students who perform at advanced levels in their classes oron state tests are automatically enrolled in advanced courses for the following academic year.

This commonsense reform is based on the observation that many high-performing students are not receiving advanced learning opportunities, even when there is clear evidence that they are ready to advance academically. This is especially true for low-income and rural students, who have much less access to rigorous advanced opportunities, ranging from gifted education to accelerated coursework to AP courses. Recent research demonstrates there are many such students, leading to a chronic under challenging of many of our brightest children. As a result, these students are less likely to be ready for today’s workforce or post-secondary education.

As a case in point, Western Kentucky University and Johns Hopkins University recently collaborated on Project Launch Plus. This initiative identified talented students in low-income, rural communities in Kentucky and North Carolina and provided them with advanced education. Although we anticipated finding many eligible students, the sheer number exceeded our expectations. There is tremendous talent in every single one of Kentucky’s schools, but many of these students do not have the necessary opportunities to develop those talents fully. The provisions in HB 190 will help provide those opportunities.

We encourage Senate Leadership to bring final passage to House Bill 190 so that Kentucky students can begin benefiting from its provisions.

Concerns about automatic enrollment tend to focus on cost and implementation. Regarding cost, we point to North Carolina’s experience, which began with passage of its auto-enrollment law for mathematics in 2018. The state education agency and districts now have years of experience with implementation and have seen impacts well beyond expectations by elevating the overall importance of advanced coursework opportunities. Cost proved not to be an issue: In the end, the same number of teachers educates the same number of students, leading to no additional financial burden on the state or school districts.

Implementation was challenging in some districts but can be overcome. For example, due to teacher inexperience with advanced coursework and small numbers of identified students, some districts used a range of non-traditional staffing options to promote access, including staff-sharing, transporting students, and online courses to ensure that all eligible students are able to access challenging coursework. In other cases, it was simply not on their radar that they weren’t offering advanced courses commensurate with other districts, and they could just reassign existing staff to, for example, teach algebra instead of the standard 8th grade course.

Despite these implementation challenges, North Carolina’s experience is a major policy success, with thousands of additional students enrolling in advanced math courses each year. An important key to the state’s success is that auto-enrollment begins in elementary school, before students get lost in the transitions to middle and high school. The effects appear to be most significant with middle school students and those from traditionally underserved backgrounds, such as the rural and low-income students noted above. Similar success in Kentucky would transform the STEM pipeline in the Commonwealth.

If passed and signed into law, House Bill 190 allows the Kentucky Board of Education to create regulations to administer the new provisions. We strongly encourage the Board to require the Kentucky Department of Education to (1) collect districts’ advanced education plans to promote public access to the information and (2) issue an annual report summarizing the impact of auto-enrollment, including district level reports of the number and percentage of eligible students served. Annual reports in North Carolina have been invaluable data sources for tracking the impact of the law.

HB 190 is bold, innovative, and highly likely to be effective. It will provide a strong foundation for efforts to help Kentucky’s students excel in the classroom and eventually in the workforce.

Jonathan Plucker is a professor at Johns Hopkins University and a past-president of the National Association for Gifted Children. Brenda Berg is President & CEO of BEST NC (Business for Educational Success and Transformation in North Carolina).

Statement on the Passage of House Bill 208 from Brigitte Blom, the Prichard Committee
5 min read

Statement on the Passage of House Bill 208 from Brigitte Blom, the Prichard Committee

With the passage of Kentucky House Bill 208 in the House, the commonwealth is one step closer to fostering learning...

March 12, 2025

Contact: Lisa McKinney, Communications Director, The Prichard Committee

(cell) 859-475-7202

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

LEXINGTON, Ky — With the passage of Kentucky House Bill 208 in the House, the commonwealth is one step closer to fostering learning environments that prioritize academic success, social and emotional well-being, and safety in schools. Congratulations to bill sponsor Rep. Josh Bray for his work on the legislation.

The academic benefits of limiting personal device use in schools are well-documented. Research shows that grades improve when students are not dividing their attention between learning and their devices. Teacher morale and retention also improve when the burden of managing smartphone distractions is lifted, allowing them to concentrate on instruction and student engagement.

The social and emotional health benefits are equally compelling. Schools that minimize device use report increased feelings of connectedness and cohesion among students, leading to less loneliness and decreased bullying. Encouraging face-to-face interaction helps students develop essential interpersonal skills, build confidence, and foster healthy in-person relationships.

By creating learning environments free from the distractions and potential harms of personal devices, we empower all students to thrive.  

------

The Prichard Committee believes in the power and promise of public education –early childhood through college– to ensure Kentuckians’ economic and social well-being. We are a citizen-led, non-partisan, solutions-focused nonprofit, established in 1983 with a singular mission of realizing a path to a larger life for Kentuckians with education at the core.